The former chairman and co-founder of the now-defunct bank Signature Bank, Scott Shay, revealed that the bank known for its crypto-friendly approach, made substantial reductions in digital asset deposits due to heightened market volatility and regulatory apprehensions towards the end of the previous year.
Scott Shay described the unfolding of extraordinary events on Monday during his prepared testimony. Shay, along with former Signature Bank President Eric Howell and former Silicon Valley Bank CEO Gregory Becker, is scheduled to testify in front of the Senate Banking Committee. The failure of Silicon Valley Bank, SVB, occurred just days before the collapse of Signature Bank in March.Â
Despite the withdrawal of billions by depositors and the failures of other banks, Shay expressed confidence in the solvency and operation of Signature Bank, stating that it was always well-capitalized and had a solid plan to withstand additional withdrawals.
The New York Department of Financial Services took possession of Signature Bank on March 12 to protect depositors, a decision that Shay disagreed with but acknowledged the role of bank regulators in the financial system.
The collapse of several crypto and tech-focused banks, including Signature Bank, SVB, and Silvergate Capital, had a significant impact on the crypto industry, leading to some accusations of intentional targeting by the government.
However, NYDFS Superintendent Adrienne Harris dismissed those claims, stating that the possession of Signature Bank was not about crypto and should not be considered “Choke Point 2.0.”
Also Read: A Criminal Investigation Was Underway before Signature Bank Collapsed
