Former Chief of the SEC Office of Internet Enforcement, John Reed Stark, has criticized the idea of creating a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), labeling it as the “most absurd financial idea in the history of monetary policy.”
According to Stark, the fundamental question that needs to be addressed before considering a CBDC is what problem it actually solves. He argues that there is no clear answer to this question.
Stark points out that there are already numerous digital currencies in existence that function effectively and enjoy trust because they are regulated, audited, and overseen by democratic government authorities. These digital currencies are operated by regulated financial institutions registered with the FDIC or SIPC, providing an additional layer of security.
The former SEC official expresses concern about the promotion of crypto and the failure to acknowledge its negative impacts. He argues that labeling crypto as innovative is a misconception.
He highlights the potential dangers of a CBDC, which could lead to various policy challenges. These include its impact on the market structure of the financial sector, the accessibility and affordability of credit, the safety and stability of the financial system, and the effectiveness of monetary policy.
Stark aligns himself with Hilary Allen, who testified before the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs about Stablecoins and CBDCs. Both share the belief that CBDCs introduce unnecessary risks to global financial stability and open floodgates to privacy concerns, conflicts, and cybersecurity threats.
Although crypto enthusiasts might contend that similar risks exist within banks, Stark argues that a comparison between banks and crypto firms disproves this claim. “Banks are heavily regulated and depositors generally have a broad range of proven and time-tested protections.”
Conversely, crypto firms lack insurance, regulatory oversight, consumer safeguards, examinations, audits, licensure, mandated cybersecurity standards, fiduciaries, customer asset segregation, and rules against insider trading or market manipulation.
The controversial opinion of the Former SEC Cheif has attracted comments and has been criticized by the entire community and a number of well known names. Stark even found himself debating with the billionaire Mark Cuban where the entrepreneur highlighted the need for stringent regulations like Japan and how it can impact investors.