In a bold move, Elon Musk and Tesla have launched a counteroffensive response against Evan Spencer, the lawyer representing the plaintiffs in the Dogecoin lawsuit.Â
According to a Reuters report, Musk and his legal team filed a motion for Rule 11 sanctions, claiming that Spencer was fully aware of the falseness underlying his case when he lodged the claims.
The latest court filing by Musk and Tesla comes over a month after Spencer submitted an amended complaint on behalf of the plaintiffs.Â
The complaint had accused the tech billionaire of making billions by unloading his DOGE holdings after artificially boosting the meme coin’s value through Twitter.
However, Musk’s attorneys argued in their new filing that the wallets mentioned in the amended complaint did not belong to Tesla or its owner.
Interestingly, Musk’s legal team asserted that Spencer knew this fact even before submitting the amended complaint, which also included allegations of insider trading.
With this latest development, Musk and Tesla have shown they are willing to aggressively defend their position and challenge the claims made against them.
The motion for Rule 11 sanctions signifies a strategic offensive to discredit the opposing counsel, highlighting their alleged knowledge of the case’s false premise.
The repercussions are evident not just in the legal arena but also in the cryptocurrency market.
Also Read: Elon Musk-Linked Robinhood Wallets Move 10 Billion+ Dogecoin
As the legal battle continues to unfold, the outcome will undoubtedly have far-reaching implications for both Elon Musk and Dogecoin.
Investors and enthusiasts eagerly await the next steps in this high-stakes litigation, as it navigates the complex intersection of law, cryptocurrency, and the influence of high-profile figures like Musk.
